Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):209-237 (2005)

Abstract
During the 1970s, a "revolution" in American paleobiology took place. It came about in part because a group of mostly young, ambitious paleontologists adapted many of the quantitative methodologies and techniques developed in fields including biology and ecology over the previous several decades to their own discipline. Stephen Jay Gould, who was then just beginning his career, joined others in articulating a singular vision for transforming paleontology from an isolated and often ignored science to a "nomothetic discipline" that could sit at evolution's "high table." Over the course of a single decade, between 1970 and 1980, this transformation had in large part been accomplished. Among those most centrally involved in this process were Gould, Thomas Schopf, David Raup, and Gould's graduate student Jack Sepkoski, all of whom made major contributions in theoretical and quantitative analysis of the fossil record and evolutionary history. Recognizing that an ideological agenda was not enough, Gould and others developed and promoted new outlets, technologies, and pedagogical strategies to nurture their new discipline. This paper describes this process of transformation, and presents Sepkoski's education and participation as exemplary of the "new model paleontologist", which Gould hoped to produce.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10739-004-2084-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Overcoming the Underdetermination of Specimens.Caitlin Wylie - 2019 - Biology and Philosophy 34 (2):24.
Gould’s Replay Revisited.Derek D. Turner - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):65-79.
A Web of Controversies: Complexity in the Burgess Shale Debate. [REVIEW]Christian Baron - 2011 - Journal of the History of Biology 44 (4):745 - 780.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Stephen Jay Gould, Darwinian Iconoclast?David Sepkoski - 2008 - In Oren Harman & Michael Dietrich (eds.), Rebels, Mavericks, and Heretics in Biology. Yale University Press. pp. 321--337.
“Replaying Life's Tape”: Simulations, Metaphors, and Historicity in Stephen Jay Gould's View of Life.David Sepkoski - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:73-81.
Stephen Jay Gould: Did He Bring Paleontology to the "High Table"?Donald Prothero - 2009 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 1 (20130604).
Gould on Laws in Biological Science.Lee Mcintyre - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (3):357-367.
Book Review. [REVIEW]David Sepkoski - 2011 - Journal of the History of Biology 44 (4):797-799.
Book Review. [REVIEW]David Sepkoski - 2015 - Journal of the History of Biology 48 (3):487-490.
Macroevolution.David Sepkoski - 2008 - In Michael Ruse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press. pp. 211--237.
Gould’s Laws.Chris Haufe - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (1):1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
26 ( #391,433 of 2,385,745 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #372,785 of 2,385,745 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes