Journal of Philosophical Logic 50 (2):249-283 (2021)

One of the best known approaches to the logic of agency are the ‘stit’ logics. Often, it is not the actions of an individual agent that bring about a certain outcome but the joint actions of a set of agents, collectively. Collective agency has received comparatively little attention in ‘stit’. The paper maps out several different forms, several different senses in which a particular set of agents, collectively, can be said to bring about a certain outcome, and examines how these forms can be expressed in ‘stit’ and stit-like logics. The outcome that is brought about may be unintentional, and perhaps even accidental; the account deliberately ignores aspects such as joint intention, communication between agents, awareness of other agents’ intentions and capabilities, even the awareness of another agent’s existence. The aim is to investigate what can be said about collective agency when all such considerations are ignored, besides mere consequences of joint actions. The account will be related to the ‘strictly stit’ of Belnap and Perloff, 25–48 1993) and their suggestions concerning ‘inessential members’ and ‘mere bystanders’. We will adjust some of those conjectures and distinguish further between ‘potentially contributing bystanders’ and ‘impotent bystanders’.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10992-020-09554-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,848
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Agency and Deontic Logic.John F. Horty - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Dynamic Logic of Agency I: Stit, Capabilities and Powers.Andreas Herzig & Emiliano Lorini - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (1):89-121.
An Investigation in the Logics of Seeing-to-It-That.Ming Xu - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Axioms for Deliberative Stit.Ming Xu - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (5):505-552.
Collective Agency, Direct Action and Dynamic Operators.José Carmo - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (1):66-98.
Stit and the Language of Agency.Michael Perloff - 1991 - Synthese 86 (3):379 - 408.
Combinations of Stit with Ought and Know.Ming Xu - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):851-877.
Combinations of Stit and Actions.Ming Xu - 2010 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (4):485-503.
From BDI and Stit to Bdi-Stit Logic.Caroline Semmling & Heinrich Wansing - 2008 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 17 (1-2):185-207.
A Neutral Temporal Deontic STIT Logic.Kees van Berkel & Tim Lyon - 2019 - In P. Blackburn, E. Lorini & M. Guo (eds.), Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. Berlin, Heidelberg: pp. 340-354.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,300,652 of 2,432,828 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #213,827 of 2,432,828 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes