Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (4):427-443 (2003)

Authors
Abstract
To operationalize the methodological assessment of evolutionary psychology, three requirements are proposed that, if satisfied, would show that a hypothesis is not a just-so story: (1) theoretical entrenchment (i.e., that the hypothesis under consideration is a consequence of a more fundamental theory that is empirically well-confirmed across a very wide range of phenomena), (2) predictive success (i.e., that the hypothesis generates concrete predictions that make it testable and eventually to a certain extent corroborated), and (3) failure of rival explanations (i.e., that crucial and successful predictions attributed to the hypothesis in question cannot be derived from alternative hypotheses). The author argues that the hypothesis about evolutionary sex differences in human jealousy satisfies all three requirements. Key Words: evolutionary psychology • adaptationism • philosophy of science • testability.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0048393103257964
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,759
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inference to the Best Explanation.Peter Lipton - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):421-423.
Inference to the Best Explanation.Jonathan Vogel - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (3):419.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
49 ( #210,606 of 2,432,599 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,136 of 2,432,599 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes