Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):413-426 (1998)
My aim in this paper is to take a closer look at an influential argument that purports to prove that the existence of cultural prohibitions could never be explained by biological inhibitions. The argument is two-pronged. The first prong reduces to the claim: inhibitions cannot cause prohibitions simply because inhibitions undermine the raison dêtre of prohibitions. The second strategy consists in arguing that inhibitions cannot cause prohibitions because the two differ importantly in their contents. I try to show that both claims fail.
|Keywords||insect taboos Westermarck natural selection sociobiology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Familiarity Breeds: Incest and the Ptolemaic Dynasty.Sheila L. Ager - 2005 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 125:1-34.
Similar books and articles
The (Lack of) Economic Analysis by Courts in Israeli Antitrust Cases Concerning Restraints of Trade.David Gilo - manuscript
Music, Tendencies, and Inhibitions: Reflections on a Theory of Leonard Meyer.Renee Cox Lorraine - 2001 - Scarecrow Press.
Music, Tendencies, and Inhibitions: Reflections on a Theory of Leonard Meyer.Anthony Gritten - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):194-196.
Interpretations of Life and Prohibitions Against Killing.Thomasine Kushner - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):147-154.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #167,546 of 2,154,065 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,555 of 2,154,065 )
How can I increase my downloads?