Biology and Philosophy 13 (3):413-426 (1998)
AbstractMy aim in this paper is to take a closer look at an influential argument that purports to prove that the existence of cultural prohibitions could never be explained by biological inhibitions. The argument is two-pronged. The first prong reduces to the claim: inhibitions cannot cause prohibitions simply because inhibitions undermine the raison dêtre of prohibitions. The second strategy consists in arguing that inhibitions cannot cause prohibitions because the two differ importantly in their contents. I try to show that both claims fail.
Similar books and articles
Interpretations of Life and Prohibitions Against Killing.Thomasine Kushner - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (2):147-154.
Music, Tendencies, and Inhibitions: Reflections on a Theory of Leonard Meyer.Anthony Gritten - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (2):194-196.
Music, Tendencies, and Inhibitions: Reflections on a Theory of Leonard Meyer.Renee Cox Lorraine - 2001 - Scarecrow Press.
The (Lack of) Economic Analysis by Courts in Israeli Antitrust Cases Concerning Restraints of Trade.David Gilo - manuscript
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Are moral norms rooted in instincts? The sibling incest taboo as a case study.Nathan Cofnas - 2020 - Biology and Philosophy 35 (5):47.
References found in this work
Not in Our Genes: Biology, Ideology and Human Nature.Steven Rose, Richard Charles Lewontin & Leon J. Kamin - 1984 - Pantheon.
The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference.Ian Hacking - 1975 - Cambridge University Press.
The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and Against the Existence of God.J. L. MacKie - 1982 - Oxford University Press.
Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature.Philip Kitcher & J. H. Fetzer - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (3):389-392.