In this article I criticize the recommendations of some prominent statisticians about how to estimate and compare probabilities of the repeated sudden infant death and repeated murder. The issue has drawn considerable public attention in connection with several recent court cases in the UK. I try to show that when the three components of the Bayesian inference are carefully analyzed in this context, the advice of the statisticians turns out to be problematic in each of the steps.
Keywords SIDS  probability  Murder  Royal Statistical Society
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/bjps/axm015
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Incompatibility and the Pessimistic Induction: A Challenge for Selective Realism.Florian J. Boge - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11 (2):1-31.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The `Discovery' of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.P. A. Davies - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):55-55.
Sudden Infant Death. Patterns, Puzzles and Problems.M. P. M. Richards - 1986 - Journal of Biosocial Science 18 (2):249.
Infant Suffering Revisited.Andrew Chignell - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):475-484.


Added to PP index

Total views
572 ( #11,360 of 2,432,569 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
56 ( #13,370 of 2,432,569 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes