Art as an Autopoietic Sub-System of Modern Society

Theory, Culture and Society 18 (1):75-103 (2001)

Abstract
This article is concerned with Niklas Luhmann's theory of art which he formulated in the 1990s, based on his general theory of autopoietic systems. This theory regards modern society as a functionally differentiated formation whose sub-systems operate according to their inner principles of communication. According to this, the domain of art can also be seen as an operationally closed and self-referential communicative system. The basic problem in these notions lies in the way in which their description of the relationships existing between different systems is only in very narrow terms. Consequently they partially ignore the present process of de-differentiation which has noticeably changed the status of art in society. Instead, Luhmann's ideas expressly emphasize that functional differentiation is an ongoing process. In order to describe the process of de-differentiation, social theory does not need to abandon the concept of autopoiesis, but it does need to understand social systems as interlaced formations which, to an increasing extent, contain common normative and organizational constituents. Because social systems are not altogether self-referential formations, the concept of autopoiesis can describe them only in part. This particular concept of system has been developed in particular by Richard Münch, and as such it forms a productive alternative to the theory of autopoietic social systems
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/02632760122051652
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,461
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft.Niklas Luhmann - 1999 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 61 (2):388-389.
Art Worlds.Howard S. Becker - 1982 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 41 (2):226-226.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Rediscovering the Theological in Sociology.W. J. F. Keenan - 2003 - Theory, Culture and Society 20 (1):19-42.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Critical Autopoiesis and the Materiality of Law.Andreas Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (2):389-418.
Beyond Historicism: From Leibniz to Luhmann.Jaap den Hollander - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (2):210-225.
How Can a Social System Be Autopoietic?Raivo Palmaru - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):170-172.
Law as a Social System.Niklas Luhmann (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Who Observes? An Appropriate Theory of Observation is in Demand.H. Egner - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):12-13.
Social Autopoiesis?H. Urrestarazu - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):153-166.
The Autopoiesis of Social Systems.R. Vanderstraeten - 2014 - Constructivist Foundations 9 (2):181-183.
Living Systems: Autonomy, Autopoiesis and Enaction.Mario Villalobos & Dave Ward - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (2):225-239.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-02

Total views
14 ( #623,326 of 2,286,454 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #858,829 of 2,286,454 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature