Authors
Abstract
Infinity and infinite sets, as traditionally defined in mathematics, are shown to be logical absurdities. To maintain logical consistency, mathematics ought to abandon the traditional notion of infinity. It is proposed that infinity should be replaced with the concept of “indefiniteness”. This further implies that other fields drawing on mathematics, such as physics and cosmology, ought to reject theories that postulate infinities of space and time. It is concluded that however indefinite our calculations of space and time become, the Universe must nevertheless be finite.
Keywords Infinity  Infinite  Philosophy of Mathematics  Space and Time  Cosmology  Finitism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Partially Skeptical Response to Hart and Russell. [REVIEW]Denys A. Turner - 2011 - In Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.), Infinity: New Research Frontiers. Cambridge University Press.
Varieties of Finitism.Manuel Bremer - 2007 - Metaphysica 8 (2):131-148.
Infinity: New Research Frontiers.Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-23

Total views
5,154 ( #268 of 2,340,250 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
466 ( #569 of 2,340,250 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes