The Development of the Kinetic Theory of Gases I. Herapath
Annals of Science 13 (3):188-198 (1957)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)DOI
10.1080/00033790.1957.9728319
My notes
Similar books and articles
Philosophy and the kinetic theory of gases.Henk W. de Regt - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):31-62.
Philosophy and the Kinetic Theory of Gases.Henk W. De Regt - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):31 - 62.
The development of the kinetic theory of gases.S. G. Brush - 1957 - Annals of Science 13 (4):273-282.
The development of the kinetic theory of gases III. Clausius.S. G. Brush - 1958 - Annals of Science 14 (3):185-196.
The development of the kinetic theory of gases IV. Maxwell.S. G. Brush - 1958 - Annals of Science 14 (4):243-255.
From dust figures to the kinetic theory of gases: August kundt and the changing nature of experimental physics in the 1860s and 1870s. [REVIEW]David Cahan - 1990 - Annals of Science 47 (2):151-172.
Philosophical objections to the kinetic theory.John Nyhof - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (1):81-109.
Transport Theory and Collective Modes. I. The Case of Moderately Dense Gases.T. Petrosky - 1999 - Foundations of Physics 29 (9):1417-1456.
Scientific realism in action: Molecular models and Boltzmann's bildtheorie.Henk W. Regt - 2005 - Erkenntnis 63 (2):205 - 230.
Scientific Realism in Action: Molecular Models and Boltzmann’s Bildtheorie. [REVIEW]Henk W. de Regt - 2005 - Erkenntnis 63 (2):205-230.
Scientific discovery and Maxwell's kinetic theory.Peter Achinstein - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):409-434.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
21 (#543,330)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
2014-01-20
Downloads
21 (#543,330)
6 months
1 (#450,993)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The development of the kinetic theory of gases.S. G. Brush - 1957 - Annals of Science 13 (4):273-282.
Some Early Kinetic Theories of Gases: Herapath and his Predecessors.G. R. Talbot & A. J. Pacey - 1966 - British Journal for the History of Science 3 (2):133-149.
