Journal of Business Ethics 7 (10):763 - 770 (1988)

This paper examines four major arguments advanced by opponents of race and gender conscious affirmative action and rebuts them on the basis of moral considerations. It is clear that the problem of past racial/gender discrimination has not disappeared; its effects linger, resulting in a wide disparity in opportunities and attainments between minorities/women and whites/males. Affirmative action, although not the perfect solution, is by far the most viable method of redressing the effects of past discrimination. Thus it cannot be dismissed lightly by way of arguing for mere colorblindness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00411023
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,683
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Ethical Case for Affirmative Action.Prue Burns & Jan Schapper - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):369-379.
Justice in Preferential Hiring.M. S. Singer & A. E. Singer - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (10):797 - 803.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
228 ( #45,802 of 2,462,432 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #119,538 of 2,462,432 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes