Authors
Hasana Sharp
McGill University
Abstract
Like any broad narrative about the history of ideas, this one involves a number of simplifications. My hope is that by taking a closer look Spinoza's notorious remarks on animals, we can understand better why it becomes especially urgent in this period as well as our own for philosophers to emphasize a distinction between human and nonhuman animals. In diagnosing the concerns that give rise to the desire to dismiss the independent purposes of animals, we may come to focus on a new aspect of what needs to change about contemporary thinking on species divisions. In what follows, I will bring out Spinoza's contradictory and ambivalent remarks pertaining to the specific differences between humans and animals. It is my suspicion that this ambivalence continues to plague us today. Like Spinoza, we want to say that humans are like and unlike animals. As a simply descriptive claim, it may be true and innocuous. Yet, the way we affirm our proximity and distance from nonhuman animals requires careful attention. Spinoza viewed this proximity as a source of danger. We might do well to emphasize, with thinkers such as Donna Haraway (2003),how our proximity and difference are also sources of pleasure and power, both to be able to enjoy the affectionate bond that can often develop between humans and our animal companions but also to quell the anxiety that might encourage us to exploit and abuse them.
Keywords Spinoza  Animals  Affects
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Spinoza and the Possibilities for Radical Climate Ethics.Hasana Sharp - 2017 - Dialogues in Human Geography 7 (2):156-60.
Joyful Proximities.Moira Gatens - 2019 - Philosophy Today 63 (3):805-813.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization.Hasana Sharp - 2011 - University of Chicago Press.
Human Affects as Properties of Cognitions in Spinoza's Philosophical Psychotherapy.Amihud Gilead - 1999 - In Yirmiyahu Yovel (ed.). Little Room Press. pp. 169--181.
Spinoza's Metaphysical Psychology.Michael Della Rocca - 1996 - In Don Garrett (ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 192--266.
‘Use Them At Our Pleasure.John Grey - 2013 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 30 (4):367-388.
Radość. Ujęcie Descartes’a i Spinozy.Jolanta Żelazna - 2009 - In Zbigniew Drozdowicz (ed.), Filozofia XVII wieku i jej kontynuacje. Wydawnictwo Fundacji Humaniora.
Spinoza's Environmental Ethics.Genevieve Lloyd - 1980 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):293 – 311.
Spinoza’s Hobbesian Naturalism and Its Promise for a Feminist Theory of Power.Ericka Tucker - 2013 - Revista Conatus - Filosofia de Spinoza 7 (13):11-23.
„ “Eve’s Perfection: Spinoza on Sexual (In)Equality.”.Hasana Sharp - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 50.4 (2012) 50 (4):559-580.
The Machine That Therefore I Am. Brown - 2014 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 47 (4):494-514.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-01-21

Total views
35 ( #273,545 of 2,329,886 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #392,703 of 2,329,886 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes