Big Data and Society 4 (2) (2017)

Authors
Burkhard Schafer
University of Edinburgh
John Danaher
University College, Galway
Abstract
We are living in an algorithmic age where mathematics and computer science are coming together in powerful new ways to influence, shape and guide our behaviour and the governance of our societies. As these algorithmic governance structures proliferate, it is vital that we ensure their effectiveness and legitimacy. That is, we need to ensure that they are an effective means for achieving a legitimate policy goal that are also procedurally fair, open and unbiased. But how can we ensure that algorithmic governance structures are both? This article shares the results of a collective intelligence workshop that addressed exactly this question. The workshop brought together a multidisciplinary group of scholars to consider barriers to legitimate and effective algorithmic governance and the research methods needed to address the nature and impact of specific barriers. An interactive management workshop technique was used to harness the collective intelligence of this multidisciplinary group. This method enabled participants to produce a framework and research agenda for those who are concerned about algorithmic governance. We outline this research agenda below, providing a detailed map of key research themes, questions and methods that our workshop felt ought to be pursued. This builds upon existing work on research agendas for critical algorithm studies in a unique way through the method of collective intelligence.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/2053951717726554
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,319
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Legitimacy.Fabienne Peter - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Global Labor: Algocratic Modes of Organization.A. Aneesh - 2009 - Sociological Theory 27 (4):347 - 370.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Digital Phenotype: A Philosophical and Ethical Exploration.Michele Loi - 2019 - Philosophy and Technology 32 (1):155-171.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Freedom in an Age of Algocracy.John Danaher - forthcoming - In Shannon Vallor (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Society-in-the-Loop: Programming the Algorithmic Social Contract.Iyad Rahwan - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (1):5-14.
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.John Danaher - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):245-268.
Corporate Governance Research Opportunities in Nigeria: A National Development Issue.Rosemary O. Obasi - 2019 - International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 87:13-22.
True Collective Intelligence? A Sketch of a Possible New Field.Geoff Mulgan - 2014 - Philosophy and Technology 27 (1):133-142.
Research Ethics Governance – An African Perspective.Marelize I. Schoeman - 2019 - In Nico Nortjé, Retha Visagie & J. S. Wessels (eds.), Social Science Research Ethics in Africa. Springer Verlag. pp. 1-15.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-11-24

Total views
10 ( #872,283 of 2,448,667 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #97,523 of 2,448,667 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes