Medical Humanities 45 (2):183-187 (2019)

Abstract
Contemporary medicine distinguishes between illness and disease. Illness refers to a person’s subjective experience of symptoms; disease refers to objective bodily pathology. For many illnesses, medicine has made great progress in finding and treating associated disease. However, not all illnesses are successfully relieved by treating the disease. In some such cases, the patient’s suffering can only be reduced by treatment that is focused on the illness itself. Chronic disabling fatigue is a common symptom of illness, for which disease-focused treatment is often not effective, but for which illness-focused treatments often are. In this article, we explore a controversy surrounding illness-focused treatments for fatigue. We do this by contrasting their acceptance by people whose fatigue is associated with a disease with their controversial rejection by some people whose fatigue is not associated with an established disease ). In order to understand this difference in acceptability we consider the differing moral connotations of illness and disease and then go on to examine the limitations of the concepts of illness and disease themselves. We conclude that a general acceptance of illness-focused treatments by all who might benefit from them will require a major long-term change in thinking about illness, but that improvements to the care of individual patients can be made today.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medhum-2018-011598
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,481
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Disease, Illness, and Ethics.Amnon Goldworth - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (3):346-351.
Coming Out: Considering the Closet of Illness. [REVIEW]Kimberly R. Myers - 2004 - Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (4):255-270.
An Anatomy of Illness.David Biro - 2012 - Journal of Medical Humanities 33 (1):41-54.
The Temporality of Illness: Four Levels of Experience.S. Kay Toombs - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Reflexões sobre illness E disease.Gilberto Leocádio de Lima Filho - 2015 - Saberes Em Perspectiva 5 (13):7-24.
On the Triad Disease, Illness and Sickness.Bjørn Hofmann - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):651 – 673.
Fuzzy Health, Illness, and Disease.Kazem Sadegh-Zadeh - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (5):605 – 638.
Why Naming Disease Differs From Naming Illness.Marvin J. H. Lee - 2018 - AMA Journal of Ethics 20 (12):E1195-1200.
Can I Be Ill and Happy?Havi Carel - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (2):95-110.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-10

Total views
22 ( #491,090 of 2,446,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #148,356 of 2,446,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes