Cryoethics: Seeking life after death

Bioethics 23 (9):515-521 (2009)

David M. Shaw
University of Basel
Cryonic suspension is a relatively new technology that offers those who can afford it the chance to be 'frozen' for future revival when they reach the ends of their lives. This paper will examine the ethical status of this technology and whether its use can be justified. Among the arguments against using this technology are: it is 'against nature', and would change the very concept of death; no friends or family of the 'freezee' will be left alive when he is revived; the considerable expense involved for the freezee and the future society that will revive him; the environmental cost of maintaining suspension; those who wish to use cryonics might not live life to the full because they would economize in order to afford suspension; and cryonics could lead to premature euthanasia in order to maximize chances of success. Furthermore, science might not advance enough to ever permit revival, and reanimation might not take place due to socio-political or catastrophic reasons. Arguments advanced by proponents of cryonics include: the potential benefit to society; the ability to cheat death for at least a few more years; the prospect of immortality if revival is successful; and all the associated benefits that delaying or avoiding dying would bring. It emerges that it might be imprudent not to use the technology, given the relatively minor expense involved and the potential payoff. An adapted and more persuasive version of Pascal's Wager is presented and offered as a conclusive argument in favour of utilizing cryonic suspension.
Keywords Death  Life extension  Cryonics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01760.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Is Living Longer Living Better?Larry S. Temkin - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):193-210.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

What is the Ethics of Ageing?Christopher Simon Wareham - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (2):128-132.
Against the Integrative Turn in Bioethics: Burdens of Understanding.Lovro Savić & Viktor Ivanković - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (2):265-276.
'Is Cryonics an Ethical Means of Life Extension?'.Rebekah Cron - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Exeter

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
312 ( #21,700 of 2,311,192 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #44,392 of 2,311,192 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature