Deaf by design: Disability and impartiality

Bioethics 22 (8):407-413 (2008)
David M. Shaw
University of Basel
In 'Benefit, Disability and the Non-Identity Problem', Hallvard Lillehammer uses the case of a couple who chose to have deaf children to argue against the view that impartial perspectives can provide an exhaustive account of the rightness and wrongness of particular reproductive choices. His conclusion is that the traditional approach to the non-identity problem leads to erroneous conclusions about the morality of creating disabled children. This paper will show that Lillehammer underestimates the power of impartial perspectives and exaggerates the ethical force of partial perspectives, which in turn commits him to providing weak justifications for the choice made by the couple in his example case
Keywords procreative liberty  impartiality  non‐identity problem  designer babies  deafness  disability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history
Admin Source id: blackwell//10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x   Serial ID: 113203
Change log    Delete without trace    Inspect

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,515
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
78 ( #80,188 of 2,268,267 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #145,368 of 2,268,267 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature