Deaf by design: Disability and impartiality

Bioethics 22 (8):407-413 (2008)
Abstract
In 'Benefit, Disability and the Non-Identity Problem', Hallvard Lillehammer uses the case of a couple who chose to have deaf children to argue against the view that impartial perspectives can provide an exhaustive account of the rightness and wrongness of particular reproductive choices. His conclusion is that the traditional approach to the non-identity problem leads to erroneous conclusions about the morality of creating disabled children. This paper will show that Lillehammer underestimates the power of impartial perspectives and exaggerates the ethical force of partial perspectives, which in turn commits him to providing weak justifications for the choice made by the couple in his example case
Keywords procreative liberty  impartiality  non‐identity problem  designer babies  deafness  disability
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2008.00658.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,607
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
77 ( #78,312 of 2,235,874 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #100,792 of 2,235,874 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature