Do the right thing! Rule finitism, rule scepticism and rule following

Human Studies 22 (2-4):193-210 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rule following is often made an unnecessary mystery in the philosophy of social science. One form of mystification is the issue of 'rule finitism', which raises the puzzle as to how a learner can possibly extend the rule to applications beyond those examples which have been given as instruction in the rule. Despite the claim that this problem originated in the work of Wittgenstein, it is clear that his philosophical method is designed to evaporate, not perpetuate, such problems. The supposed problem of rule finitism is malformed, deriving from misconceptions about the relation between understanding a rule and making an application of it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Notes on "Epistemology of a Rule-Based Expert System".William J. Clancey - 1993 - Artificial Intelligence 59 (1-2):191-204.
Exhuming the Body of the Corpus Delicti Rule.Clifton Perry - 2007 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):253-264.
The Reality of Rule-Following.Philip Pettit - 1990 - Mind 99 (393):1-21.
The Exception Proves the Rule.Richard Holton - 2010 - Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (4):369-388.
Jeffrey's Rule of Conditioning.Glenn Shafer - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):337-362.
The Problem of the Criterion in Rule-Following.Tomoji Shogenji - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):501-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#142,070)

6 months
1 (#416,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?