Ethics and responsibility in politics

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):304 – 317 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX


After summarizing Weber's description of the 'ethic of ultimate ends' and the 'ethic of responsibility', the assumptions underlying his classification are examined, especially the relationship of violent and non-violent means to politics and to political responsibility. It is argued that the two assumptions underlying the classification have been demonstrated by events since his 1918 lecture to be invalid. Therefore the classification itself no longer has validity. Its rejection has political implications and requires fresh attention to the problems of political ethics. The outline of a possible alternative classification of political ethics, focused on their view of means and ends, is tentatively offered as a stimulus to further thought.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

24 (#676,707)

6 months
4 (#859,620)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references