Explaining crossover and superiority as left-to-right evaluation

Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (1):91 - 134 (2005)
Abstract
We present a general theory of scope and binding in which both crossover and superiority violations are ruled out by one key assumption: that natural language expressions are normally evaluated (processed) from left to right. Our theory is an extension of Shan’s (2002) account of multiple-wh questions, combining continuations (Barker, 2002) and dynamic type-shifting. Like other continuation-based analyses, but unlike most other treatments of crossover or superiority, our analysis is directly compositional (in the sense of, e.g., Jacobson, 1999). In particular, it does not postulate a level of Logical Form or any other representation distinct from surface syntax. One advantage of using continuations is that they are the standard tool for modeling order-of-evaluation in programming languages. This provides us with a natural and independently motivated characterization of what it means to evaluate expressions from left to right. We give a combinatory categorial grammar that models the syntax and the semantics of quantifier scope and wh-question formation. It allows quantificational binding but not crossover, in-situ wh but not superiority violations. In addition, the analysis automatically accounts for a variety of sentence types involving binding in the presence of pied piping, including reconstruction cases such as Whose criticism of hisi mother did each personi resent?
Keywords Linguistics   Philosophy of Language   Artificial Intelligence   Computational Linguistics   Semantics   Syntax
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10988-005-6580-7
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,071
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Towards a Variable-Free Semantics.Pauline Jacobson - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (2):117-185.
Crossover Situations.Daniel Büring - 2004 - Natural Language Semantics 12 (1):23-62.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Parasitic Scope.Chris Barker - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (4):407-444.
Types as Graphs: Continuations in Type Logical Grammar. [REVIEW]Chris Barker & Chung-chieh Shan - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):331-370.
Scopability and Sluicing.Chris Barker - 2013 - Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (3):187-223.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Parasitic Scope.Chris Barker - 2007 - Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (4):407-444.
Remark on Jacobson 1999: Crossover as a Local Constraint. [REVIEW]Chris Barker - 2004 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (4):447 - 472.
Humor.Aaron Smuts - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Relational Nouns, Pronouns, and Resumption.Ash Asudeh - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (4):375 - 446.
Types as Graphs: Continuations in Type Logical Grammar. [REVIEW]Chris Barker & Chung-chieh Shan - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):331-370.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

217 ( #16,163 of 2,132,817 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #239,354 of 2,132,817 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums