David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this paper I examine critically the relationship between the realist and nominalist views of abstract objects. I begin by pointing out some differences between the usage of existential statements in metaphysics and the usage of such statements in disciplines outside of philosophy. Then I propose an account of existence that captures the characteristic intuitions underlying the latter kind of usage. This account implies that abstract object existence claims are not as ontologically extravagant as they seem, and that such claims are immune to certain standard nominalistic criticisms.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christer Svennerlind (2008). Moderate Nominalism and Moderate Realism. Dissertation, Gothenburg University
Mark Colyvan (2011). Fictionalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In E. J. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Yvonne Raley (2008). Deflating Existence Away? A Critique of Azzouni's Nominalism. Philosophia Mathematica 17 (1):73-83.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). Paradigms and Russell's Resemblance Regress. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651.
Gyula Klima (2005). The Essentialist Nominalism of John Buridan. Review of Metaphysics 58 (4):739 - 754.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads110 ( #41,264 of 1,924,708 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #124,767 of 1,924,708 )
How can I increase my downloads?