AbstractIn this note, I point out some implications of the experiential principle* for the nature of the relationship between language and the world. I argue that this principle implies the existence of a certain relationship between linguistic tokens and facts, and that this relationship undermines most critiques of the referentiality of language
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Similar books and articles
Explanation and Reality in Linguistics.Michael Devitt - 2008 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):203-231.
What We Know When We Know a Language.Barry C. Smith - 2006 - In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. pp. 941.
The Linguistic Territoriality Principle — a Critique.Helder de Schutter - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (2):105–120.
Temporal Language and Temporal Reality.Heather Dyke - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):380–391.
Semantic Normativity and Coordination Games: Social Externalism Deflated.Daniel Lassiter - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (3):209-228.
The Relationship of Language to the Formation of Concepts.Eric H. Lenneberg - 1962 - Synthese 14 (1):104-109.
How Not to Theorize About the Language of Subjective Uncertainty.Eric Swanson - 2009 - In Andy Egan & Brian Weatherson (eds.), Epistemic Modality. Oxford University Press.