Is it justifiable to abandon all search for a logic of discovery?

Abstract
In his influential paper, 'Why Was the Logic of Discovery Abandoned?', Laudan contends that there has been no philosophical rationale for a logic of discovery since the emergence of consequentialism in the 19th century. It is the purpose of this paper to show that consequentialism does not involve the rejection of all types of logic of discovery. Laudan goes too far in his interpretation of the historical shift from generativism to consequentialism, and his claim that the context of pursuit belongs to neither discovery nor justification is based on narrow interpretations of the contexts of discovery and justification. As a result, Laudan draws unwarranted conclusions concerning both the early and contemporary defenders of a logic of discovery. A methodological logic of discovery - which involves self-corrective methods of hypothesis generation that promote the long-term goals of science and which require consequential support for justification - is a type of logic of discovery that survives the shift to consequentialism.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698590701589544
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,749
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The New Organon.Francis Bacon - 2007 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Early Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell.
The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice.Paul R. Thagard - 1978 - Journal of Philosophy 75 (2):76-92.

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Logics of Discovery in Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.
The Logics of Discovery in Popper’s Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303-319.
To Envision a New Particle or Change an Existing Law? Hypothesis Formation and Anomaly Resolution for the Curious Case of the Β Decay Spectrum.Tjerk Gauderis - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45 (1):27-45.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Logic of Discovery.Kevin T. Kelly - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):435-452.
Beyond Divorce: Current Status of the Discovery Debate.Thomas Nickles - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):177-206.
Does Scientific Discovery Have a Logic?Herbert A. Simon - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (4):471-480.
Discovery and its Logic: Popper and the "Friends of Discovery".Claude Savary - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (3):318-344.
The Logics of Discovery in Popper's Evolutionary Epistemology.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):303 - 319.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
37 ( #144,324 of 2,198,093 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,198,093 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature