Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 18 (2):121-146 (2010)
AbstractSome commentators have claimed that Emmanuel Levinas's philosophy should be understood as a response to the Holocaust. This study assesses that claim. It begins by clarifying what it means to call his philosophy a “response.” The bulk of the article then analyzes his essay, “Useless Suffering,” one of the few works in Levinas's philosophic oeuvre where he discusses the Holocaust. Levinas is widely read as claiming that there can be no explanation for the Holocaust—that it marks “the end of theodicy.” It is shown, however, that his point is not that it cannot be explained, but that we misjudge the nature of evil when we view it as calling for explanation rather than practical activity. Based on this analysis, it is argued that Levinas's philosophy can be understood as a response to the Holocaust in the sense of being a performative writing that sought to address the evil that occurred in the Holocaust by transforming the ethical sensibilities of his readers
Similar books and articles
Emil L. Fackenheim: A Jewish Philosopher’s Response to the Holocaust.David Patterson - 2008 - Syracuse University Press.
On the Alleged Uniqueness and Incomprehensibility of the Holocaust.B. William Owen - 1995 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 2 (3):8-16.
The Holocaust and the Henmaid's Tale: A Case for Comparing Atrocities.Karen Davis - 2005 - Lantern Books.
“Rhetorical Criticism, Holocaust Studies, and the Problem of Ethos” (A Reply to “Ethos, Witness, and Holocaust ‘Testimony’”].David E. Beard - 2000 - JAC 20 20:949-956.
Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Tiantai Doctrine of Evil as the Good: A Response to David R. Loy.Brook Ziporyn - 2005 - Philosophy East and West 55 (2):329-347.
Banal Evil and Useless Knowledge: Hannah Arendt and Charlotte Delbo on Evil After the Holocaust.Jennifer L. Geddes - 2003 - Hypatia 18 (1):104-115.
From Auschwitz to Jerusalem to Gaza: Ethics for the Want of Law.David M. Seymour - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):205-215.
Challenging Dutch Holocaust Education: Towards a Curriculum Based on Moral Choices and Empathetic Capacity.Jacob R. Boersema & Noam Schimmel - 2008 - Ethics and Education 3 (1):57-74.
Human Nature and Holocaust: Understanding Levinas’s Account of Ethics Through Levi and Wiesel.Rockwell F. Clancy - 2012 - Philosophy and Literature 36 (2):330-346.
Understanding Evil: American Slavery, the Holocaust, and the Conquest of the American Indians:Vessels of Evil: American Slavery and the Holocaust. Laurence Mordekhai Thomas.James P. Sterba - 1996 - Ethics 106 (2):424-.
Doing Justice to the Derrida–Levinas Connection: A Response to Mark Dooley.Bob Plant - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):427-450.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Useless Suffering.Emmanuel Levinas - 1988 - In Robert Bernasconi & David Wood (eds.), The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other. Routledge. pp. 156--167.
Evil and the Temptation of Theodicy.Richard J. Bernstein - 2002 - In Simon Critchley & Robert Bernasconi (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Levinas. Cambridge University Press. pp. 252--267.
Some Questions for My Levinasian Friends.David Wood - 2005 - In Eric Sean Nelson, Antje Kapust & Kent Still (eds.), Addressing Levinas. Northwestern University Press. pp. 152--169.