In Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (eds.), Abstractionism: Essays in Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford University Press (2016)

Authors
Gabriel Uzquiano
University of Southern California
Stewart Shapiro
Ohio State University
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to assess the prospects for a Scottish neo-logicist foundation for a set theory. We show how to reformulate a key aspect of our set theory as a neo-logicist abstraction principle. That puts the enterprise on the neo-logicist map, and allows us to assess its prospects, both as a mathematical theory in its own right and in terms of the foundational role that has been advertised for set theory. On the positive side, we show that our abstraction based theory can be modified to yield much of ordinary mathematics, indeed everything needed to recapture all branches of mathematics short of set theory itself. However, our conclusions are mostly negative. The theory will fall far short of the power of ordinary Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It is consistent that our set theory has models that are relatively small, smaller than the first cardinal with an uncountable index. More important, there is a strong tension between the idea that the iterative hierarchy is somehow ineffable, or indefinitely extensible, and the neo-logicist theme of capturing mathematical theories with abstraction principles.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2016, 2018
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
DOI 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645268.001.0001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,593
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Frege's Cardinals and Neo-Logicism.Roy T. Cook - 2016 - Philosophia Mathematica 24 (1):60-90.
Books of Essays.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Philosophia Mathematica:nkx003.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Nature and Limits of Abstraction. [REVIEW]Stewart Shapiro - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):166 - 174.
New V, ZF and Abstraction.Stewart Shapiro & Alan Weir - 1999 - Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):293-321.
The Limits of Abstraction.Kit Fine - 2002 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The State of the Economy: Neo-Logicism and Inflation.Roy T. Cook - 2002 - Philosophia Mathematica 10 (1):43-66.
Abstraction Reconceived.J. P. Studd - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (2):579-615.
Structural-Abstraction Principles.Graham Leach-Krouse - 2015 - Philosophia Mathematica:nkv033.
Abstraction and Set Theory.Bob Hale - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):379--398.
Bad Company Generalized.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2009 - Synthese 170 (3):331 - 347.
Relative Categoricity and Abstraction Principles.Sean Walsh & Sean Ebels-Duggan - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):572-606.
Neologicist Nominalism.Rafal Urbaniak - 2010 - Studia Logica 96 (2):149-173.
Some Aspects of the Theory of Abstraction in Plotinus and Iamblichus.Claudia Maggi - 2015 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 9 (2):159-176.
Abstraction Relations Need Not Be Reflexive.Jonathan Payne - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):137-147.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-11

Total views
27 ( #411,243 of 2,462,066 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #298,852 of 2,462,066 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes