Kant's "argument from geometry"

Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):195-215 (2004)
: Kant's 'argument from geometry' is usually interpreted to be a regressive transcendental argument in support of the claim that we have a pure intuition of space. In this paper I defend an alternative interpretation of this argument according to which it is rather a progressive synthetic argument meant to identify and establish the essential role of pure spatial intuition in geometric cognition. In the course of reinterpreting the 'argument from geometry' I reassess the arguments of the Aesthetic and illustrate the origin of Kant's view of the role of pure intuition in geometry
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2004.0034
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,628
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A Formal System for Euclid's Elements.Jeremy Avigad, Edward Dean & John Mumma - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):700--768.
Kant's Argument for Transcendental Idealism in the Transcendental Aesthetic.Lucy Allais - 2010 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 110 (1pt1):47-75.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
215 ( #22,048 of 2,235,935 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #20,030 of 2,235,935 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature