Legal Theory 6 (2):127-170 (2000)

Abstract
Legal positivism is generally characterized by its commitment to two theses Separability Thesis,” denies any necessary connection between morality and legality. Legal positivists do not require that a norm possess any desirable, or lack any undesirable, moral attributes in order to count as law
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1352325200062017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,972
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Genetics and Criminal Responsibility.Stephen J. Morse - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (9):378-380.
Joseph Raz’s Theory of Authority.Kenneth Ehrenberg - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (12):884-894.
Legal Truths and Falsities.Matthew Noah Smith - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (1):95-109.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Stability, Assurance, and the Concept of Legal Guidance.Adam Hill - 2015 - Law and Philosophy 34 (2):141-171.
Positivism And The Inseparability Of Law And Morals.Leslie Green - 2008 - New York University Law Review 83:1035--1058.
Incorporation by Law.Joseph Raz - 2004 - Legal Theory 10 (1):1-17.
Should Law Improve Morality?Leslie Green - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (3):473-494.
Common Sense Morality Versus Role Morality.Ján Kalajtzidis - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):133-143.
Legal Positivism and the Moral Aim Thesis.David Plunkett - 2013 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (3):563-605.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-23

Total views
53 ( #188,247 of 2,410,231 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,573 of 2,410,231 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes