Political Theory 38 (1):142-147 (2010)

Hasana Sharp
McGill University
Rorty finds that my own appropriation of Spinoza toward a reconception of ideology critique falls short, however, by (a) failing to “take Spinoza’s mind-body identity seriously” and by (b) advocating a “battle of ideas” rather than an enlargement of perspective. She presents an illuminating analysis of how, according to Spinoza, dichotomies serve as blunt provisional tools that become counterproductive once understanding is reached. She suggests that I preserve certain distinctions to the detriment of my own liberation project,such as the distinction between the truth of an idea and its persuasive force.As part of criticism (a), she admonishes me for neglecting the importance of material conditions, and with criticism (b) she suggests that the imagery of battle misconstrues the project of becoming rational and the power of truth.Below I will try to show that we do not disagree about either the importance of material conditions for a project of political transformation or the identity of mind and body in substance. We do disagree, however, about the character of ideology critique. I will offer an example, in an attempt to demonstrate why it is neither a distortion of Spinoza nor strategically counterproductive to understand the project of thinking as an effort of what I call “resistant reconstruction” within the attribute of thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/0090591709348876
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,480
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Rorty Becoming Rorty: The Early Writings.Richard Zane Rumana - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany
Nietzsche and the Critique of Oppositional Thinking.Alan D. Schrift - 1989 - History of European Ideas 11 (1-6):783-790.
Richard Rorty’s Disenchanted Liberalism.Jeffrey Metzger - 2010 - Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (1):107-128.
Reply to Haack.Richard Rorty - 1995 - In Herman J. Saatkamp (ed.), Rorty & Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics. Vanderbilt University Press. pp. 148--153.
Reply to Ramberg.Richard Rorty - 2000 - In Robert Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics. Blackwell. pp. 370--377.
Reply to Habermas.Richard Rorty - 2000 - In Robert Brandom (ed.), Rorty and His Critics. Blackwell. pp. 56--64.
Feminism and Pragmatism : A Reply to Richard Rorty.Sabina Lovibond - 2010 - In Marianne Janack (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Richard Rorty. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Neil Gross, Richard Rorty : The Making of an American Philosopher. Kuklick - 2011 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (1):33-37.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #485,847 of 2,330,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #585,854 of 2,330,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes