On the nonapplicability of a rational analysis to human cognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (3):502-503 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The rational analysis of human cognition.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2002 - In José Luis Bermúdez & Alan Millar (eds.), Reason and Nature: Essays in the Theory of Rationality. New York: Clarendon Press. pp. 135--174.
Is It Rational To Be Rational?Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:115-122.
Does rational analysis stand up to rational analysis?Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):88-89.
Rationality, function, and content.John L. Pollock - 1992 - Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2):129-151.
The “is-ought fallacy” fallacy.Mike Oaksford & Nick Chater - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (5):262-263.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
21 (#758,633)

6 months
8 (#411,621)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?