Authors
Timothy Shanahan
Loyola Marymount University
Abstract
The concept of ‘phylogenetic inertia’ is routinely deployed in evolutionary biology as an alternative to natural selection for explaining the persistence of characteristics that appear sub-optimal from an adaptationist perspective. However, in many of these contexts the precise meaning of ‘phylogenetic inertia’ and its relationship to selection are far from clear. After tracing the history of the concept of ‘inertia’ in evolutionary biology, I argue that treating phylogenetic inertia and natural selection as alternative explanations is mistaken because phylogenetic inertia is, from a Darwinian point of view, simply an expected effect of selection. Although Darwin did not discuss ‘phylogenetic inertia,’ he did assert the explanatory priority of selection over descent. An analysis of ‘phylogenetic inertia’ provides a perspective from which to assess Darwin’s view.
Keywords Darwin  phylogenetic inertia  natural selection  adaptationism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.013
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,864
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Don't Zebras Have Machine Guns Adaptation, Selection, and Constraints in Evolutionary Theory.Timothy Shanahan - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (1):135-146.
Why Don’T Zebras Have Machine Guns? Adaptation, Selection, and Constraints in Evolutionary Theory.Timothy Shanahan - 2008 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 39 (1):135-146.
Adaptationism, Adaptation, and Optimality.Robert C. Richardson - 2003 - Biology and Philosophy 18 (5):695-713.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Phylogenetic Inertia and Darwin's Higher Law.Timothy Shanahan - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (1):60-68.
Nature and Inertia.Thomas J. McLaughlin - 2008 - Review of Metaphysics 62 (2):251-284.
Moral Inertia.Carolina Sartorio - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (1):117 - 133.
Branching From Inertia Worlds.T. Fernando - 2008 - Journal of Semantics 25 (3):321-344.
Existential Inertia and the Five Ways.Edward Feser - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):237-267.
The World’s Continuance: Divine Conservation or Existential Inertia?John Beaudoin - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):83 - 98.
On the Explanation of Inertia.Adán Sus - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (2):293-315.
Perspectives on the Animal Mind.Robert A. Skipper - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (4):483-487.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-04

Total views
8 ( #959,949 of 2,433,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #463,753 of 2,433,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes