| Authors | |
| Abstract |
In this note I examine the two main differences between Plato's and Dennett's views of the self as an abstract object. I point out that in the presence of certain forms of ontological realism, abstract-object theories of the self are compatible with the full reality of the self. I conclude with some remarks on the relationship between ontology and ethics.
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Pretense, Existence, and Fictional Objects.Anthony Everett - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):56–80.
Composite Objects and the Abstract/Concrete Distinction.Daniel A. Kaufman - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:215-238.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
162 ( #60,279 of 2,419,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,713 of 2,419,781 )
2009-01-28
Total views
162 ( #60,279 of 2,419,781 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,713 of 2,419,781 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
