Logos and Episteme 10 (2):207-213 (2019)

Authors
Michael Shaffer
St. Cloud State University
Abstract
It is an under-appreciated fact that Quine's rejection of the analytic/synthetic distinction, when coupled with some other plausible and related views, implies that there are serious difficulties in demarcating empirical theories from pure mathematical theories within the Quinean framework. This is a serious problem because there seems to be a principled difference between the two disciplines that cannot apparently be captured in the orthodox Quienan framework. For the purpose of simplicity let us call this Quine's problem of demarcation. In this paper this problem will be articulated and it will be shown that the typical sorts of responses to this problem are all unworkable within the Quinean framework. It will then be shown that the lack of resources to solve this problem within the Quinean framework implies that Quine’s version of the indispensability argument cannot get off the ground, for it presupposes the possibility of making such a distinction.
Keywords Quine  Mathematics  Indispensability  Science  Confirmation  Holism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
ISBN(s) 2069-0533
DOI 10.5840/logos-episteme201910218
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indispensability Without Platonism.Anne Newstead & James Franklin - 2012 - In Alexander Bird, Brian Ellis & Howard Sankey (eds.), Properties, Powers, and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 81-97.
Indispensability and Holism.Jacob Busch - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):47-59.
Numbers Without Science.Russell Marcus - 2007 - Dissertation, The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York
On What Is Not There. Quine, Meinong, and the Indispensability Argument.Majid Davoody Beni - 2013 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (25):77-94.
A Indispensabilidade da Matemática na Ciência Natural.Eduardo Castro - 2011 - Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa.
The Confirmation of Mathematics and its Relationship to Science.Anthony Francis Peressini - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Indispensability Arguments and Instrumental Nominalism.Richard Pettigrew - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):687-709.
Holism and Indispensability.Jörgen Sjögren - 2012 - Logique Et Analyse 55 (219):463-476.
The Indispensability of Mathematics. [REVIEW]Anthony F. Peressini - 2003 - Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):208-223.
Confirmation Theory and Indispensability.Mark Colyvan - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 96 (1):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-10

Total views
98 ( #93,694 of 2,331,237 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #18,704 of 2,331,237 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes