Rawls and Religious Paternalism

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):373-386 (2012)
Abstract
MacDougall has argued that Rawls’s liberal social theory suggests that parents who hold certain religious convictions can legitimately refuse blood transfusion on their children’s behalf. This paper argues that this is wrong for at least five reasons. First, MacDougall neglects the possibility that true freedom of conscience entails the right to choose one’s own religion rather than have it dictated by one’s parents. Second, he conveniently ignores the fact that children in such situations are much more likely to die than to survive without blood. Third, he relies on an ambiguous understanding of what is "rational" and treats children as mere extensions of their parents. Fourth, he neglects the fact that those in the original position would seek to protect themselves from persecution and enslavement and thus would not allow groups of children to be killed because of their parents’ beliefs. Finally, Rawls makes it clear that we should choose for children as we would choose for ourselves in the original position, with no particular conception of the good (such as that held by Jehovah’s Witnesses)
Keywords Medical ethics  Liberalism  Refusal of treatment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhs022
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,106
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Human: Substance, Relationship, Choice, Value and Nature.H. A. Phillips - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (4):325-330.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Freedom of Religion and Children.Hugh LaFollette - 1989 - Public Affairs Quarterly (1):75-87.
A Theory of Justice?Philip Pettit - 1974 - Theory and Decision 4 (3-4):311-324.
Rawls and the Problem of Honour.Kevin W. Gray - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):213-222.
Human Embryos in the Original Position?Russell Disilvestro - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):285 – 304.
Libertarianism, Autonomy, And Children.Morris Lipson & Peter Vallentyne - 1991 - Public Affairs Quarterly 5 (4):333-352.
Fundamental Interests and Parental Rights.Michael W. Austin - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (2):221-235.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-11-09

Total downloads

30 ( #171,677 of 2,171,743 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,743 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums