Robot nannies get a wheel in the door: A response to the commentaries

Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (2):302-313 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Robot nannies: Future or fiction?Egon L. van den Broek - 2010 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (2):274-282.
Oversold, unregulated, and unethical: Why we need to respond to robot nannies.Blay Whitby - 2010 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (2):290-294.
Robot teachers: The very idea!Amanda Sharkey - 2015 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38.
Humans, fruit flies, and automatons.Evan Charney - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):381-410.
When is a robot a moral agent.John P. Sullins - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 6 (12):23-30.
Anaximander's Measurements.D. O'Brien - 1967 - Classical Quarterly 17 (02):423-.
Internalism’s Wheel.Michael Smith - 1995 - Ratio 8 (3):277-302.
There is no 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (expanded & revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-16

Downloads
56 (#274,303)

6 months
18 (#127,601)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Amanda Jane Caroline Sharkey
University of Sheffield

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references