Philosophical Studies 174 (4):1073-1090 (2017)
AbstractThere are few indulgences academics can crave more than to have their work considered and addressed by leading researchers in their field. We have been fortunate to have two outstanding philosophers from whose work we have learned a great deal give ours their thoughtful attention. Grappling with Stephen Yablo’s, and Juan Comesaña’s comments and criticisms has helped us gain a better understanding of our ideas as well as their shortcomings. We are extremely grateful to them for the attentiveness and seriousness with which they have considered our arguments and to philosophical studies for giving us this opportunity. Given the substantive difference between the two response papers, there is not much beyond sincere gratitude that we can covey to them jointly. We will therefore address them in turn.
Similar books and articles
Abstract Expressionism and the Communication Problem.David Liggins - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (3):599-620.
On Sharon and Spectre’s Argument Against Closure.Juan Comesaña - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (4):1039-1046.
Are There a Posteriori Conceptual Necessities?Daniel Dohrn - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 155 (2):181-197.
Yablo Sequences in Truth Theories.Cezary Cieśliński - 2013 - In K. Lodaya (ed.), Logic and Its Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science LNCS 7750. Springer. pp. 127--138.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo’s Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.
Replies. [REVIEW]John Martin Fischer - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (1):267-278.
Replies. [REVIEW]John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):467-480.
Yablo's Paradox and Referring to Infinite Objects.O. Bueno & M. Colyvan - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):402 – 412.
Rosser-Type Undecidable Sentences Based on Yablo’s Paradox.Taishi Kurahashi - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (5):999-1017.
Reply to Commentators: [Loar, Yablo, Corbí, Moya].Paul A. Boghossian - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:253-260.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Epistemic Closure and Epistemological Optimism.Claudio de Almeida - 2020 - Philosophia 49 (1):113-131.
Can Probability Theory Explain Why Closure is Both Intuitive and Prone to Counterexamples?Marcello Di Bello - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (9):2145-2168.
References found in this work
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.