The Availability Heuristic and Inference to the Best Explanation

Logos and Episteme 10 (4):409-432 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper shows how the availability heuristic can be used to justify inference to the best explanation in such a way that van Fraassen's infamous "best of a bad lot" objection can be adroitly avoided. With this end in mind, a dynamic and contextual version of the erotetic model of explanation sufficient to ground this response is presented and defended.

Similar books and articles

Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation.Valeriano Iranzo - 2009 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 22 (3):339-346.
The functions of fossils: Inference and explanation in functional morphology.Derek Turner - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 31 (1):193-212.
Inference to the best explanation made coherent.Igor Douven - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (Supplement):S424-S435.
Reactionary responses to the Bad Lot Objection.Finnur Dellsén - 2017 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 61:32-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-08

Downloads
718 (#20,375)

6 months
127 (#23,408)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Shaffer
Gustavus Adolphus College

Citations of this work

There Are No Bad Lots, Only Bad Formulations of Inference to the Best Explanation.Kevin Davey - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Integrating Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation.Michael J. Shaffer - 2022 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 14 (2):1-18.
Veritistic Teleological Epistemology, the Bad Lot, and Epistemic Risk Consistency.Raimund Pils - forthcoming - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie:1-21.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references