Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):519-521 (2007)

David M. Shaw
University of Basel
It is widely accepted in clinical ethics that removing a patient from a ventilator at the patient’s request is ethically permissible. This constitutes voluntary passive euthanasia. However, voluntary active euthanasia, such as giving a patient a lethal overdose with the intention of ending that patient’s life, is ethically proscribed, as is assisted suicide, such as providing a patient with lethal pills or a lethal infusion. Proponents of voluntary active euthanasia and assisted suicide have argued that the distinction between killing and letting die is flawed and that there is no real difference between actively ending someone’s life and "merely" allowing them to die. This paper shows that, although this view is correct, there is even less of a distinction than is commonly acknowledged in the literature. It does so by suggesting a new perspective that more accurately reflects the moral features of end-of-life situations: if a patient is mentally competent and wants to die, his body itself constitutes unwarranted life support unfairly prolonging his or her mental life.
Keywords Euthanasia  Consent  Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2006.020073
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,199
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
430 ( #22,925 of 2,517,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,126 of 2,517,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes