Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):706-706 (2011)
Ethics committees have a bad reputation for impeding, rather than facilitating research. Here, I argue that many committees actually improve the quality of the research proposal to such an extent that they deserve credit as authors in any resulting publications, or at least an acknowledgement of the contribution made.
|Keywords||Ethics Publication ethics Research ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-Authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.Daniela Cutas & David Shaw - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1315-1329.
Similar books and articles
Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies. [REVIEW]Elise Smith & Bryn Williams-Jones - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):199-212.
Publication Ethics and the Ghost Management of Medical Publication.Sergio Sismondo & Mathieu Doucet - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (6):273-283.
The Low Risk Research Ethics Application Process at CQUniversity Australia.Teresa Moore & Kristy Richardson - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (3):211-230.
Confessions of an Ethics Committee Chair.Christine Halse - 2011 - Ethics and Education 6 (3):239 - 251.
Ethics Education and Value Prioritization Among Members of U.S. Hospital Ethics Committees.Adrian Bardon - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):395-406.
The Authorless Paper: The ICMJE’s Definition of Authorship is Illogical and Unethical.David Shaw - 2011 - British Medical Journal 343 (7831):999.
Tis but a Scratch: The Human Tissue Act and the Use of Tissue for Research, Issues for Research Ethics Committees.David Hunter - unknown
The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation.Paul M. McNeill - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
The Activity of French Research Ethics Committees and Characteristics of Biomedical Research Protocols Involving Humans: A Retrospective Cohort Study. [REVIEW]Evelyne Decullier, Véronique Lhéritier & François Chapuis - 2005 - BMC Medical Ethics 6 (1):1-10.
Research Ethics Committee Audit: Differences Between Committees.M. E. Redshaw, A. Harris & J. D. Baum - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (2):78-82.
Contextual Challenges in South Africa: The Role of a Research Ethics Committee. [REVIEW]Brenda Louw & Rina Delport - 2006 - Journal of Academic Ethics 4 (1-4):39-60.
An Eight-Year Follow-Up National Study of Medical School and General Hospital Ethics Committees in Japan.Akira Akabayashi, Brian T. Slingsby, Noriko Nagao, Ichiro Kai & Hajime Sato - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-8.
What is the Role of the Research Ethics Committee? Paternalism, Inducements, and Harm in Research Ethics.E. Garrard - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):419-423.
An Analysis on the Research Ethics Cases Managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Between 1997 and 2010.Jong Foo & Stephen Wilson - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):621-631.
Added to index2011-07-18
Total downloads21 ( #235,660 of 2,163,987 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,987 )
How can I increase my downloads?