The ethics committee as ghost author

Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (12):706-706 (2011)
Abstract
Ethics committees have a bad reputation for impeding, rather than facilitating research. Here, I argue that many committees actually improve the quality of the research proposal to such an extent that they deserve credit as authors in any resulting publications, or at least an acknowledgement of the contribution made.
Keywords Ethics  Publication ethics  Research ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2011-100120
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Confessions of an Ethics Committee Chair.Christine Halse - 2011 - Ethics and Education 6 (3):239 - 251.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-07-18

Total downloads

21 ( #235,660 of 2,163,987 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,017 of 2,163,987 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums