Tainted: How Philosophy of Science Can Expose Bad Science [Book Review]

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (2):193-196 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,960

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incorrigible Science and Doctrinal Pseudoscience.Kåre Letrud - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (3-4):269-278.
How to Do Science with Models: A Philosophical Primer. [REVIEW]Alejandro Cassini - 2017 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 31 (1):105-107.
How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment.Liv Langfeldt - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):92 - 95.
Evolutionary naturalist realism: Can this blend be coherent?1.Srdan Lelas - 1989 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 3 (2):136 – 156.
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.Stanford Unwertflv - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Isps 10:99.
Bad Beliefs: Why They Happen to Good People. [REVIEW]Eric Schliesser - 2022 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 35 (2):189-203.
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science.Lars Bergstrom, John Forge, Louis Marinoff, John Leslie & Sami Pihlstrom - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Isps 10:187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-17

Downloads
45 (#502,061)

6 months
13 (#282,665)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Arianne Shahvisi
Brighton And Sussex Medical School

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references