Sophia 50 (4):577-592 (2011)

What follows is a work of critical reconstruction of Camus' thought. It aims to answer to the wish Camus expressed in his later notebooks, that he at least be read closely. Specifically, I hope to do three things. In Part I, we will show how Camus' famous philosophy of the absurd represents a systematic scepticism whose closest philosophical predecessor is Descartes' method of doubt, and whose consequence, as in Descartes, is the discovery of a single, orienting certainty, on the basis of which Camus would proceed to pass beyond the 'nihilism' that conservative critics continued to level against him (MS 34). Part II will unfold the central tenets of Camus' mature thought of rebellion, and show how Camus' central political claims follow from his para-Cartesian claim to have found an irreducible or 'invincible' basis for a post-metaphysical ethics, consistent with the most thoroughgoing epistemic scepticism. Part III then undertakes to show that the neoclassical rhetoric and positioning Camus claimed for his postwar thought—as a thought of moderation or mesure, and a renewed Greek or Mediterranean naturalism—is more than a stylistic pretension. It represents, so I argue, a singular amalgam of modern and philosophical classical motifs which makes Camus' voice nearly unique in twentieth century ideas, and all the more worth reconsidering today. So let us proceed
Keywords Camus philosophy classicism absurd rebellion moderation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11841-011-0275-z
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,491
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Camus on the Value of Art.Thomas Pölzler - 2020 - Philosophia 48 (1):365-376.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Trial of Albert Camus.Russell Grigg - 2011 - Sophia 50 (4):593-602.
Kierkegaard and Camus: Either/Or? [REVIEW]Daniel Berthold - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (2):137-150.
Camus and Nihilism.Ashley Woodward - 2011 - Sophia 50 (4):543-559.
No Excuses.Robert C. Solomon - 1999 - Teaching Co..
The Fall.Raymond D. Boisvert - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (4):467-482.
“Is Life Worth Living?”.Ludwig F. Schlecht - 2008 - Philosophy and Theology 20 (1/2):227-242.


Added to PP index

Total views
75 ( #128,951 of 2,381,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #107,127 of 2,381,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes