The ontological ground of the alethic modality

Philosophical Review 103 (4):669-688 (1994)
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the wholly metaphysical question of whether necessity and possibility rest on nonmodal foundations—whether the truth conditions for modal statements are, in the final analysis, nonmodal. It is argued that Lewis’s modal realism is either arbitrary and stipulative or else it is circular. Even if there were Lewisean possible worlds, they could not provide the grounds for modality. D. M. Armstrong’s combinatorial approach to possibility suffers from similar defects. Since more traditional reductions to cognitive or linguistic facts suffer similar fates, the conclusion that the alethic modality is primitive and incapable of reduction is offered
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2186101
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,678
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Grounds of Necessity.Ross P. Cameron - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (4):348-358.
Has Lewis Reduced Modality?Javier Kalhat - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):504-526.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

102 ( #49,487 of 2,170,020 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #49,610 of 2,170,020 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums