The Rise of Paradigmatic Monism and Its Cultural Implications

In this paper I shall be looking at the state of science before and after the 17th century especially with regard to the question of the nature of scientific knowledge, specifically scientific paradigms. I will argue that some of the major differences between modern science and pre-modern science are due to (i) methodological changes, (ii) the rise of paradigmatic monism in modern science as opposed to paradigmatic pluralism in pre-modern science, (iii) the integration of science with technology after the 17th century. These changes, I maintain, also redefine the role of scientific knowledge in society and culture, and bring in its wake certain problems and challenges, which in turn elicit different types of responses. Pre-modern science, I argue, are admirably suited to play a cultural and religious role, partly because of a lack of a pragmatic criterion of knowledge, and the emphasis on rational coherence. This makes enchantment of nature through science, possible. However, with the further evolution of science, especially the introduction of the experimental method and the emphasis on empiricism in the 17th century, scientific knowledge now has to conform to different criteria of knowledge -pragmatic in partleading to 'paradigmatic monism' and the consequent loss of enchantment in our conception of nature. The rise of the new science beginning in the 17th century thus brings in its wake a new set of epistemological and cultural challenges which were met with in different ways. I will then comment on the different types of responses made against the rise of the new science
Keywords Conference Proceedings  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/wcp2120077151
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,478
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Consideration of Babylonian Astronomy Within the Historiography of Science.F. Rochberg - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (4):661-684.
A Reflection on the Alternative Philosophy of Science.Liu Dachun & Liu Yongmou - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):576-588.
The Birth of Modern Science: Culture, Mentalities and Scientific Innovation.Andrew Brennan - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):199-225.
The Omniscienter: Beauty and Scientific Understanding.Peter Kosso - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (1):39 – 48.
Locke on Testimony: A Reexamination.Joseph Shieber - 2009 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 26 (1):21 - 41.
Science and the Modern Mind.P. W. Bridgman, Philipp Frank & Gerald James Holton (eds.) - 1971 - Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press.
Nature and the Greeks.Erwin Schrödinger - 1951 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
32 ( #163,286 of 2,180,556 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #105,114 of 2,180,556 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums