The Swiss Report on Homeopathy: A Case Study of Research Misconduct
Swiss Medical Weekly 142:w13594 (2012)
In 2011 the Swiss government published a report on homeopathy. This report was commissioned following a 2009 referendum in which Swiss people decided that homeopathy and other alternative therapies should be covered by private medical insurance; before implementing this decision, the government wanted to establish whether homeopathy actually works. In February 2012 the report was published in English and was immediately proclaimed by proponents of homeopathy to be conclusive proof that homeopathy is effective. This paper analyses the report and concludes that it is scientifically, logically and ethically flawed. Specifically, it contains no new evidence and misinterprets previously debunked studies; it creates a new standard of evidence in order to make homeopathy appear effective and attempts to discredit randomised controlled trials as the gold standard of evidence; and almost all the authors have conflicts of interest, despite their claim that none exist. If anything, the report proves that homeopaths are willing to distort the evidence in order to support their beliefs, and its authors appear to have violated the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences principles governing scientific integrity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Strong Remedy to a Weak Ethical Defence of Homeopathy.David Shaw - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (4):549-553.
Similar books and articles
Homeopathy and Medical Ethics.David Shaw - 2011 - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 16 (1):17-21.
Homeopathy Is Where the Harm Is: Five Unethical Effects of Funding Unscientific Remedies.David Shaw - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):130-131.
Unethical Aspects of Homeopathic Dentistry.David Shaw - 2010 - British Dental Journal 209 (10):493-496.
Pre-Trial Beliefs in Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Whose Pre-Trial Belief Should Be Considered?Kirsten Hansen & Klemens Kappel - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):15-21.
Plausibility and Evidence: The Case of Homeopathy. [REVIEW]Lex Rutten, Robert T. Mathie, Peter Fisher, Maria Goossens & Michel Wassenhoven - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):525-532.
Homeopathy and Extraordinary Claims - a Response to Smith's Utilitarian Argument.Irene Sebastian - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (9):504-505.
A Suicide Right for the Mentally Ill? A Swiss Case Opens a New Debate.Jacob M. Appel - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (3):21-23.
No Remedy for Homeopathy "Research".David Shaw - 2012 - Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies 17 (4):209-10.
Corporations as Political Actors – a Report on the First Swiss Master Class in Corporate Social Responsibility.Rasche Andreas, Baur Dorothea, van Huijstee Mariëtte, Ladek Stephen, Naidu Jayanthi, Perla Cecilia, Schouten Esther, Valente Michael & Zhang Mingrui - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 80 (2):151 - 173.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-05-11
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?