David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Kybernetes 39 (3) (2010)
The purpose of this paper is to consider Turing's two tests for machine intelligence: the parallel-paired, three-participants game presented in his 1950 paper, and the “jury-service” one-to-one measure described two years later in a radio broadcast. Both versions were instantiated in practical Turing tests during the 18th Loebner Prize for artificial intelligence hosted at the University of Reading, UK, in October 2008. This involved jury-service tests in the preliminary phase and parallel-paired in the final phase.
|Keywords||Turing's imitation game Turing test parallel-paired jury service|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin Warwick, Huma Shah & James Moor (2013). Some Implications of a Sample of Practical Turing Tests. Minds and Machines 23 (2):163-177.
Huma Shah & Kevin Warwick (forthcoming). Machine Humour: Examples From Turing Test Experiments. AI and Society.
Kevin Warwick & Huma Shah (2016). Effects of Lying in Practical Turing Tests. AI and Society 31 (1):5-15.
Kevin Warwick & Huma Shah (forthcoming). The Importance of a Human Viewpoint on Computer Natural Language Capabilities: A Turing Test Perspective. AI and Society.
Similar books and articles
Dale Jacquette (1993). Who's Afraid of the Turing Test? Behavior and Philosophy 20 (21):63-74.
E. Ronald & Moshe Sipper (2001). Intelligence is Not Enough: On the Socialization of Talking Machines. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 11 (4):567-576.
Keith Gunderson (1964). The Imitation Game. Mind 73 (April):234-45.
Luciano Floridi, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Matteo Turilli (2008). Turing’s Imitation Game: Still an Impossible Challenge for All Machines and Some Judges. Minds and Machines 19 (1):145-150.
Saul Traiger (2000). Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 10 (4):561-572.
Larry Hauser (2001). Look Who's Moving the Goal Posts Now. Minds and Machines 11 (1):41-51.
Gualtiero Piccinini (2000). Turing's Rules for the Imitation Game. Minds and Machines 10 (4):573-582.
Jamie Cullen (2009). Imitation Versus Communication: Testing for Human-Like Intelligence. Minds and Machines 19 (2):237-254.
James H. Moor (2001). The Status and Future of the Turing Test. Minds and Machines 11 (1):77-93.
Y. Sato & T. Ikegami (2004). Undecidability in the Imitation Game. Minds and Machines 14 (2):133-43.
Added to index2010-03-03
Total downloads14 ( #312,074 of 1,902,964 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #219,664 of 1,902,964 )
How can I increase my downloads?