Ulysses rebound

Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):157-182 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Irrational people create problems not only for themselves and those around them, but also for those who study them. They cause trouble for social scientists because their actions are inexplicable, at least according to generally accepted models of explanation. Explanations in the social sciences normally assume the form of rationalizations: actions are explained by showing that, relative to what the subjects believe and desire, the actions were done for good reasons. Conversely, when good reasons cannot be found for why someone acted as they did, their behavior remains inscrutable. Irrational people, therefore, stymie social scientists because their actions do not reveal the rationality needed to produce adequate explanations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Arational actions.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):57-68.
Pragmatic aspects of explanation.Theodore Mischel - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (1/2):40-60.
The normative core of paternalism.Kalle Grill - 2007 - Res Publica 13 (4):441-458.
Can Intentional and Functional Explanations of Actions Coexist?Rob Vanderbeeken - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 9:143-147.
Ulysses Contracts in Medicine.Tom Walker - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (1):77-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
44 (#353,833)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references