Minerva 55 (1):117-138 (2017)

The main focus of this essay is to closely engage with the role of scientist-subjectivity in the making of objectivity in Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison’s book Objectivity, and Daston’s later and earlier works On Scientific Observation and The Moral Economy of Science. I have posited four challenges to the neo-Kantian and Foucauldian constructions of the co-implication of psychology and epistemology presented in these texts. Firstly, following Jacques Lacan’s work, I have argued that the subject of science constituted by the mode of modern science suffers from paranoia. It is not the fear of subjectivity interfering with objectivity but the impossibility of knowing the truth of the real that causes paranoia. Here, I have argued that it is not the ethos of objectivity that drives epistemology as Daston and Galison suggest, but the pathos of paranoia. The second challenge builds upon Kant’s own denial that the perfect correspondence between the human will and the moral law is possible. Kant himself thought that an ethical human act is impossible without the component of “pathology.” This questions Daston and Galison’s argument that there is always ethical imperative at the core of epistemic virtue. The third challenge contests the way Daston and Galison take appearance for being in their application of the Foucauldian concept of technologies of the self in modeling the master scientist-self. The fourth challenge questions the notion of the psychological and unconscious in the making of epistemology in Daston’s later and earlier work. Against this background, I aim to make a claim that understanding and disclosing “entities” in the scientific domain presupposes an understanding of “being” in general. My goal is to open up the discussion for an alternative conception of the scientist-subject and thereby an affective and existential formulation of science.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11024-017-9313-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,514
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Possibility of Altruism.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Oxford Clarendon Press.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Tale of Two Biographies: The Myth and Truth of Barbara McClintock.Esha Shah - 2016 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38 (4).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison * Objectivity. [REVIEW]N. Jardine - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (4):885-893.
A Historical Atlas of Objectivity.Lorraine Daston & Peter Galison - 2009 - Modern Intellectual History 6 (3):569-596.
Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison, Objectivity.Ian James Kidd - 2009 - Philosophy in Review 29 (3):170.
On Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison's Objectivity, MIT Press, 2007.Martino Rossi Monti & Patrick Singy - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1):277-288.
On Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison's Objectivity , MIT Press, 2007.Martino Rossi Monti & Patrick Singy - 2009 - Iris. European Journal of Philosophy and Public Debate 1 (1):277-288.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - The MIT Press.
Objectivity: A History Without a Hero. An Essay Review of Lorraine Daston/Peter Galison's Objectivity. [REVIEW]Olga Stoliarova - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):395 - 403.
The Journalist, the Scientist, and Objectivity.Peter Galison - 2015 - In Jonathan Y. Tsou, Alan Richardson & Flavia Padovani (eds.), Objectivity in Science. Springer Verlag.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #493,687 of 2,348,302 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,851 of 2,348,302 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes