In this paper I examine Daniel M. Wegner's line of argument against the causal efficacy of conscious will, as presented in Wegner's book "The Illusion of Conscious Will" (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002). I argue that most of the evidence adduced in the book can be interpreted in ways that do not threaten the efficacy of conscious will. Also, I argue that Wegner's view of conscious will is not an empirical thesis, and that certain views of consciousness and the self are immune to Wegner's line of argument
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Phenomenology and the Feeling of Doing : Wegner on the Conscious Will.Timothy Bayne - 2004 - In Susan Pockett (ed.), Does Consciousness Cause Behaviour? Cambridge: MIT Press.
Time for Consciousness: Intention and Introspection. [REVIEW]Komarine Romdenh-Romluc - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (3):369-376.
How to Accept Wegner's Illusion of Conscious Will and Still Defend Moral Responsibility.Richard Double - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (2):479 - 491.
Wegner on Hallucinations, Inconsistency, and the Illusion of Free Will. Some Critical Remarks.Gerben Meynen - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (3):359-372.
Why Conscious Free Will Both is and Isn't an Illusion.Max Velmans - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):677.
When Consciousness Matters: A Critical Review of Daniel Wegner's the Illusion of Conscious Will. [REVIEW]Eddy A. Nahmias - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):527-541.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads193 ( #22,361 of 2,168,592 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #30,105 of 2,168,592 )
How can I increase my downloads?