British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):169-183 (2007)

Authors
James Shelley
Auburn University
Abstract
l Carroll, that there is no reason to think that an aesthetic theory of art cannot do justice to art in its relation to the extra-artistic world. My argument depends on a reinterpretation of the aesthetic theory of Francis Hutcheson, according to which Hutcheson does not hold aesthetic perception to be non-epistemic, as Peter Kivy has maintained.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayl054
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Concept of the Aesthetic.James Shelley - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics.James Shelley - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):707-720.
Response-Dependence About Aesthetic Value.Michael Watkins & James Shelley - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):338-352.
Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste.Theodore Gracyk - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
58 ( #185,596 of 2,454,659 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,768 of 2,454,659 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes