British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):169-183 (2007)
l Carroll, that there is no reason to think that an aesthetic theory of art cannot do justice to art in its relation to the extra-artistic world. My argument depends on a reinterpretation of the aesthetic theory of Francis Hutcheson, according to which Hutcheson does not hold aesthetic perception to be non-epistemic, as Peter Kivy has maintained.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics.James Shelley - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):707-720.
Response-Dependence About Aesthetic Value.Michael Watkins & James Shelley - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (3):338-352.
Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste.Theodore Gracyk - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Similar books and articles
Aesthetics and Environment: Variations on a Theme.Arnold Berleant - 2005 - Ashgate.
Function and Normativity in Hutcheson's Aesthetic Epistemology.Pje Kail - 2000 - British Journal of Aesthetics 40 (4):441-451.
Francis Hutcheson on Aesthetic Perception and Aesthetic Pleasure.Emily Michael - 1984 - British Journal of Aesthetics 24 (3):241-255.
The Perception of Beauty in Hutcheson's First Inquiry: A Response To James Shelley.Peter Kivy - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):416-431.
The Seventh Sense: Francis Hutcheson and Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics.Peter Kivy - 2003 - Oxford University Press.
Non-Perceptual Aesthetic Properties: Comments for James Shelley.Noël Carroll - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):413-423.
Defining Art, Creating the Canon: Artistic Value in an Era of Doubt.Paul Crowther - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #127,903 of 2,178,148 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,148 )
How can I increase my downloads?