Does Belief in Dualism Protect against Maladaptive Psycho-Social Responses to Deep Brain Stimulation? An Empirical Exploration

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):40–42 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We provide empirical evidence that people who believe in dualism are more likely to be uncomfortable with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and to view it as threatening to their identity, humanity, or self. It is (neurocentric) materialists—who think the mind just is the brain—that are less inclined to fear DBS or to see it as threatening. We suggest various possible reasons for this connection. The inspiration for this brief report is a target article that addresses this issue from a theoretical perspective.

Similar books and articles

The Gold-Plated Leucotomy Standard and Deep Brain Stimulation.Grant Gillett - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):35-44.
Stimulating brains, altering minds.W. Glannon - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):289-292.
Neuroethics.Walter Glannon - 2005 - Bioethics 20 (1):37–52.


Added to PP

491 (#26,689)

6 months
46 (#46,322)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Joshua May
University of Alabama, Birmingham
Jason Shepard
Agnes Scott College

Citations of this work

Regard for Reason in the Moral Mind.Joshua May - 2018 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Add more citations