Orly Shenker
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
In recent years the magnificent world of fractals has been revealed. Some of the fractal images resemble natural forms so closely that Benoit Mandelbrot's hypothesis, that the fractal geometry is the geometry of natural objects, has been accepted by scientists and non-scientists alike. The present paper critically examines Mandelbrot's hypothesis. It first analyzes the concept of a fractal. The analysis reveals that fractals are endless geometrical processes, and not geometrical forms. A comparison between fractals and irrational numbers shows that the former are ontologically and epistemologically even more problematic than the latter. Therefore, it is argued, a proper understanding of the concept of fractal is inconsistent with ascribing a fractal structure to natural objects. Moreover, it is shown that, empirically, the so-called fractal images disconfirm Mandelbrot's hypothesis. It is conceded that the fractal geometry can be used as a useful rough approximation, but this fact has no bearing on the physical theory of natural forms
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/0039-3681(94)90072-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Emperor’s New Mind.Roger Penrose - 1989 - Oxford University Press.
The Aesthetic Value of Fractal Images.Larry Short - 1991 - British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (4):342-355.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Chaos.Robert Bishop - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Self-Organised Criticality—What It is and What It Isn’T.Roman Frigg - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):613-632.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Remarks on the Geometry of Visibles.Gordon Belot - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):581–586.
Fractal Geometry—the Case of a Rapid Career.Michal Tempczyk - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):53 – 65.
The Theory‐Ladenness of Observations, the Role of Scientific Instruments, and the Kantiana Priori.Ragnar Fjelland - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):269 – 280.
Relativity and Geometry.Roberto Torretti - 1983 - Dover Publications.
Constructivity in Geometry.Richard Vesley - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):291-294.
Contemporary Arguments for a Geometry of Visual Experience.Phillip John Meadows - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):408-430.
Standards of Equality and Hume's View of Geometry.Emil Badici - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (4):448-467.


Added to PP index

Total views
84 ( #137,013 of 2,499,419 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,169 of 2,499,419 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes