Formal Logic for Informal Logicians

Informal Logic 26 (2):199-220 (2006)
Classical logic yields counterintuitive results for numerous propositional argument forms. The usual alternatives (modal logic, relevance logic, etc.) generate counterintuitive results of their own. The counterintuitive results create problems—especially pedagogical problems—for informal logicians who wish to use formal logic to analyze ordinary argumentation. This paper presents a system, PL– (propositional logic minus the funny business), based on the idea that paradigmatic valid argument forms arise from justificatory or explanatory discourse. PL– avoids the pedagogical difficulties without sacrificing insight into argument.
Keywords discursive practice, propositional logic, paradoxes of material implication
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,411
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Aberdein (2010). Virtue in Argument. Argumentation 24 (2):165-179.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Leo Groarke (1996). Informal Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Robert Baum (1975). Logic. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

64 ( #76,195 of 1,924,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #211,945 of 1,924,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.