Inherited representations are read in development

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):1-31 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent theoretical work has identified a tightly-constrained sense in which genes carry representational content. Representational properties of the genome are founded in the transmission of DNA over phylogenetic time and its role in natural selection. However, genetic representation is not just relevant to questions of selection and evolution. This paper goes beyond existing treatments and argues for the heterodox view that information generated by a process of selection over phylogenetic time can be read in ontogenetic time, in the course of individual development. Recent results in evolutionary biology, drawn both from modelling work, and from experimental and observational data, support a role for genetic representation in explaining individual ontogeny: both genetic representations and environmental information are read by the mechanisms of development, in an individual, so as to lead to adaptive phenotypes. Furthermore, in some cases there appears to have been selection between individuals that rely to different degrees on the two sources of information. Thus, the theory of representation in inheritance systems like the genome is much more than just a coherent reconstruction of information talk in biology. Genetic representation is a property with considerable explanatory utility.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New thinking, innateness and inherited representation.Nicholas Shea - 2012 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367:2234-2244.
The extended replicator.Kim Sterelny, Kelly C. Smith & Michael Dickison - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):377-403.
Nongenetic selection and nongenetic inheritance.Matteo Mameli - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):35-71.
The new mutation theory of phenotypic evolution.Masatoshi Nei - 2007 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (30):12335-12242.
From symbolism to information? – Decoding the Gene code.Frode Kjosavik - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (3):333-349.
Bridges between development and evolution.Eva Jablonka & Marion J. Lamb - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):119-124.
Molecular and Developmental Biology.Paul Griffiths - 2002 - In Peter Machamer & Michael Silberstein (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 252-271.
The nature and significance of behavioural genetic information.Ainsley Newson - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (2):89-111.
Genetic information: Important but not “exceptional”. [REVIEW]Ruth Hannah Wilkinson - 2010 - Identity in the Information Society 3 (3):457-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-01

Downloads
293 (#66,413)

6 months
59 (#71,991)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Shea
School of Advanced Study, University of London