No Sex Please, We're Social Scientists?

American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):39-41 (2010)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstract
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265161.2010.489417
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,848
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Sex, Romance, and Research Subjects: An Ethical Exploration.Timothy F. Murphy - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):30-38.
On the Costly Compromises of Nonclinical Research Relationships.Hallie Liberto - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):41-42.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Sex Redux.Timothy F. Murphy - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (7):W4-W5.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sex, Gender, and Science.Myra J. Hird - 2004 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Social Responsibilities of Biological Scientists.Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
What is Utility?D. W. Haslett - 1990 - Economics and Philosophy 6 (1):65.
Ontological Commitments, Sex and Gender.Mari Mikkola - 2011 - In Charlotte Witt (ed.), Feminist Metaphysics. Springer. pp. 67--83.
Teaching Social Responsibility: The Manhattan Project.Penny J. Gilmer & Michael DuBois - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):206-210.
Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender.Mari Mikkola - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to PP index
2010-07-12

Total downloads
54 ( #105,405 of 2,210,506 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,895 of 2,210,506 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature